*/
The Supreme Court rejected the government’s appeal against a High Court ruling that the criminal record checks scheme used in England and Wales was ‘arbitrary’ and unlawful, and infringed human rights. The court ruled in favour of three people who claimed their lives were blighted by past minor criminal convictions.
The Supreme Court rejected the government’s appeal against a High Court ruling that the criminal record checks scheme used in England and Wales was ‘arbitrary’ and unlawful, and infringed human rights. The court ruled in favour of three people who claimed their lives were blighted by past minor criminal convictions.
The Chair of the Bar sets out how the new government can restore the justice system
In the first of a new series, Louise Crush of...
Unlocking your aged debt to fund your tax in...
Possibly, but many barristers are glad he did…
Mental health charity Mind BWW has received a £500 donation from drug, alcohol and DNA testing laboratory, AlphaBiolabs as part of its Giving Back campaign
The Institute of Neurotechnology & Law is...
How to navigate open source evidence in an era...
Brie Stevens-Hoare KC and Lyndsey de Mestre KC...
Sir Geoffrey Vos, Master of the Rolls and Head...
The Chair of the Bar sets out how the new...
No-one should have to live in sub-standard accommodation, says Antony Hodari Solicitors. We are tackling the problem of bad housing with a two-pronged approach and act on behalf of tenants in both the civil and criminal courts