*/
The law is broken. Help us prove it, writes Rohini Teather
In 2019, the long awaited LASPO post-implementation review deemed the legal aid market to be ‘operating at sufficient levels to meet demand’, adding that ‘more research is required to determine the long-term sustainability of the profession’ (para 816, p 195). While some information on practitioners and organisations has been shared by the Bar Council, Law Society and Crown Prosecution Service (resulting in the publication of a data compendium about criminal legal aid), this research by the Ministry of Justice (MOJ) hasn’t been forthcoming. Nor does it appear that there is any intention of looking at the legal aid system as a whole; a marketplace of need, supply and demand.
This time last year, the Legal Aid Practitioners Group (LAPG) decided that something different was needed – a census that sought data on every single legal aid practitioner in England and Wales. Every barrister, solicitor, legal executive, paralegal, clerk, caseworker and manager working in publicly funded law. All of those aspiring to join the profession and those who have made the decision to leave it. We want to reach every one of you to build a comprehensive picture of what life is like on the legal aid frontline; to gather demographic information but also to seek to understand issues like the connection between fee levels and commercial viability, retention and succession planning; the path that each practitioner took into the profession; the working conditions in practice and their intentions regarding it. We need to know who the people are who make up the provider base and what it will look like in the years to come.
The data that we have isn’t clear. But we know that in 2013 there were 1,592 firms with criminal legal aid contracts (Legal Services Commission, Annual Report and Accounts 2012-13 (HC337, 31.3.2013) p 16). By March 2021 this had dropped to 1,104 (Alex Chalk MP, Written Questions: Legal Aid Scheme: Contracts (UIN 166396, 16.3.2021)) – a loss of 488. Similarly, in 2013 there were 1,881 firms with contracts in civil legal aid. Eight years on and there are 1,445 – a reduction of 436. This may be due to a number of reasons, but we lack the data to tell us.
Over the past six months, we have been working with academics from Newcastle University, Cardiff University and University College London to create and refine the census to make it as user-friendly as possible. A pilot phase was completed over January and February and the census itself launched on 12 April via social media, representative body networks, and academic institutions. Practitioners can complete the survey online and are being asked to answer questions in the following capacities:
The census is open from April to June and the academic team will then spend the summer anonymising and analysing the data before reporting in early autumn.
We believe this to be the most ambitious survey ever undertaken into legal aid and its timing could not be more crucial. Data from the census will feed into both Sir Christopher Bellamy QC’s Independent Review of Criminal Legal Aid and the MOJ’s upcoming review of the sustainability of civil and family legal aid. The research is closely aligned to the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Legal Aid’s sustainability inquiry. Please support us by getting involved: we need the whole legal aid community to stand up and be counted.
In 2019, the long awaited LASPO post-implementation review deemed the legal aid market to be ‘operating at sufficient levels to meet demand’, adding that ‘more research is required to determine the long-term sustainability of the profession’ (para 816, p 195). While some information on practitioners and organisations has been shared by the Bar Council, Law Society and Crown Prosecution Service (resulting in the publication of a data compendium about criminal legal aid), this research by the Ministry of Justice (MOJ) hasn’t been forthcoming. Nor does it appear that there is any intention of looking at the legal aid system as a whole; a marketplace of need, supply and demand.
This time last year, the Legal Aid Practitioners Group (LAPG) decided that something different was needed – a census that sought data on every single legal aid practitioner in England and Wales. Every barrister, solicitor, legal executive, paralegal, clerk, caseworker and manager working in publicly funded law. All of those aspiring to join the profession and those who have made the decision to leave it. We want to reach every one of you to build a comprehensive picture of what life is like on the legal aid frontline; to gather demographic information but also to seek to understand issues like the connection between fee levels and commercial viability, retention and succession planning; the path that each practitioner took into the profession; the working conditions in practice and their intentions regarding it. We need to know who the people are who make up the provider base and what it will look like in the years to come.
The data that we have isn’t clear. But we know that in 2013 there were 1,592 firms with criminal legal aid contracts (Legal Services Commission, Annual Report and Accounts 2012-13 (HC337, 31.3.2013) p 16). By March 2021 this had dropped to 1,104 (Alex Chalk MP, Written Questions: Legal Aid Scheme: Contracts (UIN 166396, 16.3.2021)) – a loss of 488. Similarly, in 2013 there were 1,881 firms with contracts in civil legal aid. Eight years on and there are 1,445 – a reduction of 436. This may be due to a number of reasons, but we lack the data to tell us.
Over the past six months, we have been working with academics from Newcastle University, Cardiff University and University College London to create and refine the census to make it as user-friendly as possible. A pilot phase was completed over January and February and the census itself launched on 12 April via social media, representative body networks, and academic institutions. Practitioners can complete the survey online and are being asked to answer questions in the following capacities:
The census is open from April to June and the academic team will then spend the summer anonymising and analysing the data before reporting in early autumn.
We believe this to be the most ambitious survey ever undertaken into legal aid and its timing could not be more crucial. Data from the census will feed into both Sir Christopher Bellamy QC’s Independent Review of Criminal Legal Aid and the MOJ’s upcoming review of the sustainability of civil and family legal aid. The research is closely aligned to the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Legal Aid’s sustainability inquiry. Please support us by getting involved: we need the whole legal aid community to stand up and be counted.
The law is broken. Help us prove it, writes Rohini Teather
The Chair of the Bar sets out how the new government can restore the justice system
In the first of a new series, Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth considers the fundamental need for financial protection
Unlocking your aged debt to fund your tax in one easy step. By Philip N Bristow
Possibly, but many barristers are glad he did…
Mental health charity Mind BWW has received a £500 donation from drug, alcohol and DNA testing laboratory, AlphaBiolabs as part of its Giving Back campaign
The Institute of Neurotechnology & Law is thrilled to announce its inaugural essay competition
How to navigate open source evidence in an era of deepfakes. By Professor Yvonne McDermott Rees and Professor Alexa Koenig
Brie Stevens-Hoare KC and Lyndsey de Mestre KC take a look at the difficulties women encounter during the menopause, and offer some practical tips for individuals and chambers to make things easier
Sir Geoffrey Vos, Master of the Rolls and Head of Civil Justice since January 2021, is well known for his passion for access to justice and all things digital. Perhaps less widely known is the driven personality and wanderlust that lies behind this, as Anthony Inglese CB discovers
The Chair of the Bar sets out how the new government can restore the justice system
No-one should have to live in sub-standard accommodation, says Antony Hodari Solicitors. We are tackling the problem of bad housing with a two-pronged approach and act on behalf of tenants in both the civil and criminal courts
-(1)-(002).tmb-carlisting.png?sfvrsn=7615eba7_1){kind=logo}
