*/
The cost of legal education deters good candidates from less privileged backgrounds, the regulator was told.
A summary of the BSB’s initial responses to its consultation Future Bar Training showed that many respondents thought the Bar Professional Training Course (BPTC) was ‘prohibitively expensive’ and could be deterring students from a career at the Bar.
Though some thought the course, which costs up to £19,000, was value for money and were concerned that making it cheaper could compromise quality and increase applications.
A small majority of respondents supported the proposed two-stage vocational course, where only those who pass the initial online stage go on to the second part. The model is designed to filter out students likely to fail or be unable to obtain pupillage.
Supporters said it would make the preliminary part of the vocational stage cheaper, while opponents were concerned that it might reduce diversity, lower students’ expectations, and create a two-tier pathway and the separation of knowledge and skills training.
There was opposition to raising the required degree classification from 2:2 to 2:1, largely due to concerns about reducing diversity.
The BSB expects to establish a ‘preferred approach’ this summer, and will publish a consultation later in the year. See also 'The BPTC in statistics' (Counsel, March 2016).
The cost of legal education deters good candidates from less privileged backgrounds, the regulator was told.
A summary of the BSB’s initial responses to its consultation Future Bar Training showed that many respondents thought the Bar Professional Training Course (BPTC) was ‘prohibitively expensive’ and could be deterring students from a career at the Bar.
Though some thought the course, which costs up to £19,000, was value for money and were concerned that making it cheaper could compromise quality and increase applications.
A small majority of respondents supported the proposed two-stage vocational course, where only those who pass the initial online stage go on to the second part. The model is designed to filter out students likely to fail or be unable to obtain pupillage.
Supporters said it would make the preliminary part of the vocational stage cheaper, while opponents were concerned that it might reduce diversity, lower students’ expectations, and create a two-tier pathway and the separation of knowledge and skills training.
There was opposition to raising the required degree classification from 2:2 to 2:1, largely due to concerns about reducing diversity.
The BSB expects to establish a ‘preferred approach’ this summer, and will publish a consultation later in the year. See also 'The BPTC in statistics' (Counsel, March 2016).
The Chair of the Bar sets out how the new government can restore the justice system
In the first of a new series, Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth considers the fundamental need for financial protection
Unlocking your aged debt to fund your tax in one easy step. By Philip N Bristow
Possibly, but many barristers are glad he did…
Mental health charity Mind BWW has received a £500 donation from drug, alcohol and DNA testing laboratory, AlphaBiolabs as part of its Giving Back campaign
The Institute of Neurotechnology & Law is thrilled to announce its inaugural essay competition
How to navigate open source evidence in an era of deepfakes. By Professor Yvonne McDermott Rees and Professor Alexa Koenig
Brie Stevens-Hoare KC and Lyndsey de Mestre KC take a look at the difficulties women encounter during the menopause, and offer some practical tips for individuals and chambers to make things easier
Sir Geoffrey Vos, Master of the Rolls and Head of Civil Justice since January 2021, is well known for his passion for access to justice and all things digital. Perhaps less widely known is the driven personality and wanderlust that lies behind this, as Anthony Inglese CB discovers
The Chair of the Bar sets out how the new government can restore the justice system
No-one should have to live in sub-standard accommodation, says Antony Hodari Solicitors. We are tackling the problem of bad housing with a two-pronged approach and act on behalf of tenants in both the civil and criminal courts