*/
Chambers are fast realising that robust Equality, Diversity & Inclusion (EDI) strategies are not merely tick-box exercises but essential components in best practice, attracting talent and accelerating success.
Sets that are committed to raising awareness, understanding compliance regulations and promoting a diverse culture where all individuals (barristers, clerks, staff, clients) are respected and treated fairly, create an environment in which all can thrive. EDI policies help attract talent, retain members and staff and underpin innovation which is easier to drive forward in an inclusive atmosphere. Chambers that are compliant with legal and regulatory requirements avoid financial penalties, sanctions by the BSB and potential reputational damage.
Clients who insist on diversity will gravitate towards those chambers who hold these values dear and evidence this commitment; an alignment of ideals that will often generate additional revenue. The bar is raised only when the teams put forward draw on the broadest available pool of talent and experience.
Championing EDI is good practice not just in work but in life in general. A sound understanding of the issues helps us to support family and friends, as well as colleagues and clients. All in all, it makes good sense.
Despite encouraging progress, the statistics still make worrying reading and these are corroborated by a number of decisions handed down by the disciplinary tribunals over the last few years. According to Barristers’ Working Lives 2021:
The creation and implementation of an EDI framework can ameliorate many of these unsatisfactory behaviours. The BSB Handbook requires that a self-employed barrister must take ‘reasonable steps’ to ensure that their chambers has in force a written statement of policy on EDI, and a written plan for implementing the policy.
Chambers must have at least one Equality and Diversity Officer (EDO) who should be a senior member. Some have gone further, appointing two or three EDOs with one being a KC and the other(s) a senior junior. A committee should be established to assist, with at least one senior member of staff elected.
There are a number of mandatory and best practice training modules for members and staff:
Regulatory obligations with regard to anti-racism ensure all chambers must:
Recruitment and selection processes should use objective and fair criteria for hiring. This applies to pupillage recruitment as well as lateral tenancy applications. In practice any individual who has any input/say on chambers recruitment should undertake fair recruitment training.
The affairs of chambers must be conducted in a manner which is fair and equitable for all members and pupils, including monitoring fair allocation of work. Chambers will benefit from investing in specific software to help manage the process and deliver reports. Work can then be analysed and any inequalities rectified.
Chambers must regularly review its E&D policies and ensure implementation. This review should be completed annually to help analyse trends. Should remedial action be required, steps should be taken as a matter of priority.
Chambers are required to have a written anti-harassment policy which, as a minimum states that:
Some chambers have set up working groups which meet regularly to discuss incidents of harassment and bullying as well as formulating strategies to tackle these issues.
Quite simply, a barrister must not discriminate. The core anti-discrimination duty is set out in the BSB handbook and prohibits discrimination, victimisation or harassment by a barrister directly or indirectly. Any member who witnesses discrimination should raise the issue immediately to their EDO.
Chambers is required to have a parental leave policy, which must cover as a minimum:
Chambers is required to have a flexible working policy which covers the right of members and staff to take a career break, work part-time, work flexible hours or to work from home, so as to enable them to manage their family responsibilities without giving up work.
The BSB Handbook requires chambers to have a reasonable adjustments policy covering all members, pupils, staff, mini-pupils, clients and visitors.
A DDO must be a member of chambers. They are required to ensure that chambers has in place a written policy on the collection, publication, retention and destruction of diversity data. A chambers-wide diversity audit must be conducted at least every three years.
The DDO should work alongside the EDO(s) to analyse data by race, gender and disability. Subsequently, assisting in setting appropriate goals in the chambers’ E&D action plan.
Despite some of the negative stats outlined, there is real appetite for change. Many sets have not only realised minimum requirements, but have gone above and beyond to ensure best practice. Others have demonstrated innovative ideas and behaviours to promote EDI, which bodes well for the profession and those whom they serve.
Chris Kelly is a barrister at Briefed who specialises in assisting chambers and barristers improve Equality, Diversity & Inclusion through bespoke advice, training, and audits.
Chambers are fast realising that robust Equality, Diversity & Inclusion (EDI) strategies are not merely tick-box exercises but essential components in best practice, attracting talent and accelerating success.
Sets that are committed to raising awareness, understanding compliance regulations and promoting a diverse culture where all individuals (barristers, clerks, staff, clients) are respected and treated fairly, create an environment in which all can thrive. EDI policies help attract talent, retain members and staff and underpin innovation which is easier to drive forward in an inclusive atmosphere. Chambers that are compliant with legal and regulatory requirements avoid financial penalties, sanctions by the BSB and potential reputational damage.
Clients who insist on diversity will gravitate towards those chambers who hold these values dear and evidence this commitment; an alignment of ideals that will often generate additional revenue. The bar is raised only when the teams put forward draw on the broadest available pool of talent and experience.
Championing EDI is good practice not just in work but in life in general. A sound understanding of the issues helps us to support family and friends, as well as colleagues and clients. All in all, it makes good sense.
Despite encouraging progress, the statistics still make worrying reading and these are corroborated by a number of decisions handed down by the disciplinary tribunals over the last few years. According to Barristers’ Working Lives 2021:
The creation and implementation of an EDI framework can ameliorate many of these unsatisfactory behaviours. The BSB Handbook requires that a self-employed barrister must take ‘reasonable steps’ to ensure that their chambers has in force a written statement of policy on EDI, and a written plan for implementing the policy.
Chambers must have at least one Equality and Diversity Officer (EDO) who should be a senior member. Some have gone further, appointing two or three EDOs with one being a KC and the other(s) a senior junior. A committee should be established to assist, with at least one senior member of staff elected.
There are a number of mandatory and best practice training modules for members and staff:
Regulatory obligations with regard to anti-racism ensure all chambers must:
Recruitment and selection processes should use objective and fair criteria for hiring. This applies to pupillage recruitment as well as lateral tenancy applications. In practice any individual who has any input/say on chambers recruitment should undertake fair recruitment training.
The affairs of chambers must be conducted in a manner which is fair and equitable for all members and pupils, including monitoring fair allocation of work. Chambers will benefit from investing in specific software to help manage the process and deliver reports. Work can then be analysed and any inequalities rectified.
Chambers must regularly review its E&D policies and ensure implementation. This review should be completed annually to help analyse trends. Should remedial action be required, steps should be taken as a matter of priority.
Chambers are required to have a written anti-harassment policy which, as a minimum states that:
Some chambers have set up working groups which meet regularly to discuss incidents of harassment and bullying as well as formulating strategies to tackle these issues.
Quite simply, a barrister must not discriminate. The core anti-discrimination duty is set out in the BSB handbook and prohibits discrimination, victimisation or harassment by a barrister directly or indirectly. Any member who witnesses discrimination should raise the issue immediately to their EDO.
Chambers is required to have a parental leave policy, which must cover as a minimum:
Chambers is required to have a flexible working policy which covers the right of members and staff to take a career break, work part-time, work flexible hours or to work from home, so as to enable them to manage their family responsibilities without giving up work.
The BSB Handbook requires chambers to have a reasonable adjustments policy covering all members, pupils, staff, mini-pupils, clients and visitors.
A DDO must be a member of chambers. They are required to ensure that chambers has in place a written policy on the collection, publication, retention and destruction of diversity data. A chambers-wide diversity audit must be conducted at least every three years.
The DDO should work alongside the EDO(s) to analyse data by race, gender and disability. Subsequently, assisting in setting appropriate goals in the chambers’ E&D action plan.
Despite some of the negative stats outlined, there is real appetite for change. Many sets have not only realised minimum requirements, but have gone above and beyond to ensure best practice. Others have demonstrated innovative ideas and behaviours to promote EDI, which bodes well for the profession and those whom they serve.
The Chair of the Bar sets out how the new government can restore the justice system
In the first of a new series, Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth considers the fundamental need for financial protection
Unlocking your aged debt to fund your tax in one easy step. By Philip N Bristow
Possibly, but many barristers are glad he did…
Mental health charity Mind BWW has received a £500 donation from drug, alcohol and DNA testing laboratory, AlphaBiolabs as part of its Giving Back campaign
The Institute of Neurotechnology & Law is thrilled to announce its inaugural essay competition
How to navigate open source evidence in an era of deepfakes. By Professor Yvonne McDermott Rees and Professor Alexa Koenig
Brie Stevens-Hoare KC and Lyndsey de Mestre KC take a look at the difficulties women encounter during the menopause, and offer some practical tips for individuals and chambers to make things easier
Sir Geoffrey Vos, Master of the Rolls and Head of Civil Justice since January 2021, is well known for his passion for access to justice and all things digital. Perhaps less widely known is the driven personality and wanderlust that lies behind this, as Anthony Inglese CB discovers
The Chair of the Bar sets out how the new government can restore the justice system
No-one should have to live in sub-standard accommodation, says Antony Hodari Solicitors. We are tackling the problem of bad housing with a two-pronged approach and act on behalf of tenants in both the civil and criminal courts
-(1)-(002).tmb-carlisting79eb.png){kind=logo}
